not too many people read this blog, but i'm hesitant about this post because it's a bit political which i usually avoid. perhaps the draw for me is the emergence of a pop culture goddess with a political agenda. recently, famed lady gaga gave a speech called "if you don't like it, go home," urging her fans and the country to be outraged about the "don't ask don't tell" policy of the US military. the reason i saw this video was because a friend of mine on facebook posted it, and i was curious. after viewing the 16 minute long speech, i cannot remain silent. if you would like to watch the speech for yourself, click
here.
i do not agree with gaga's views, but i respect the right that she has to differing opinions. diversity is appropriate and important. that said, i do not feel compelled to respect the delivery or method of persuasion of all persons, especially when given with so much passion and so little substance. i can respect a differing opinion if it is founded upon reason and principle.
the point of gaga's speech is to suggest a new law, a law that sends home the soldiers with the problem. the soldier with the problem is the straight homophobes serving our country. the law is called "if you don't like it, go home." really?
the culmination of her speech was the rally to have all straight homophobes who are serving to be sent home in place of the openly gay individuals.
she gives the definition of straight homophobes to those who may be uncomfortable serving with gay soldiers, which is what inspired the "don't ask don't tell" policy. in her opinion, the policy "is against all we stand for as americans." her cry is that homophobic straight individuals are not fit to serve because it is "the straight soldier who has prejudice in his heart, in the space where the military asks him to hold our core american values, he insteads holds and harbors hate and he gets to stay and fight for our country. he gets the honor."
unfortunately, this point is very emotionally charged yet founded on unstable soil. first, the contempt for straight soldiers who could potentially feel uncomfortable serving with gay soldiers is unfair, the very claim gaga makes about the uncomfortable soldier. in the military you live with, sleep with, and shower with your fellows. if i were a straight woman in the military, i would be extremely uncomfortable if i was required by law to do those all of those things next to straight men, because of the sexual interest they could potentially have in me. it would have nothing to do with hating men, being afraid of men, or wanting women only to have the right to serve our country. it would have everything to do with being uncomfortable about the sexual interest generated by the intimate task of taking care of myself in front of them. i don't believe it is any different for a straight man having to shower and share a sleeping space with a gay man. it does not make the man a homophobe, a hater, or a propagator of inequality, it simply means he is uncomfortable with the potential sexual interest his fellow soldier may have in him as he is forced to bathe and sleep next to him.
i ask, if a straight man feels uncomfortable about serving with a gay man, does it mean he has hate in his heart?
should that man be discharged on account of his discomfort? yes, according to gaga's proposed law.
i can discover no logic to her argument. from my perspective it was an emotional rampage in the perceived battle between the glbt community and society in general (or in this case, the government).
the entire speech was irritating because it's purpose seems to be to raise emotions based on irrational and besides-the-point issues.
if all individuals attempting to enlist in the military were required to declare their sexuality in order to weed out and prevent homosexuals from serving, i would be much more likely to empathize with her cause. however, in gaga's accusations, declarations, and opinions stated as fact, she is doing the very thing she claims the government and all "homophobic" straight soldiers are doing - creating inequality, hate, and tension towards a military that is trying find balance between minority and majority needs.
on a humorous note that reinforces my utter disbelief in her speech, she states there have been studies that have shown that there is very little tension or disruption from units with openly gay soldiers. then she says that she'll go along with the supposition such situations really do cause tension and gives the rest of her speech, but the point of her speech is her opinion that all of the soldiers who according to her, don't really even exist, should be sent home. what?